By David R. FrawleyThe National Park Service’s naming of the Golden State’s National Forest, California’s Canyonlands National Park and the Great Basin National Monument after the flag of the United States have drawn criticism, with critics saying it is inappropriate and disrespectful.
Naming the parks after the United State’s national anthem is an act of remembrance, and the public deserves to be able to celebrate the nation’s heritage, said John D. White, a history professor at Cal State San Bernardino.
The Park Service has said it will name the national parks after other symbols, including the national flag and the national anthem.
But those choices were not taken lightly, White said.
“There are no official rules about this,” White said, adding that naming the parks in this way was an “unofficial” and “inappropriate” gesture.
“The National Parks Service should honor the national symbols of the U.S., White said in a statement released Friday.”
We are honoring and respecting the ideals of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of expression, and as such we respect and honor all of our national symbols.
“As a nation, we should always strive to respect and respect all of the American people.”
In addition to the naming of a national park and monument, the parks will also honor the work of conservation efforts to preserve our national forests and other historic sites, including naming a conservation area and a national monument.
The names of the national park areas and monuments are determined by a special commission that has been created to oversee the design of the parks.
The commission has received nearly 800 nominations, and it is scheduled to finalize its recommendations in April, White’s statement said.
The decision comes at a time when park services across the country are dealing with a crisis of natural and cultural heritage.
Some parks are in the process of restoring or adding new areas to their parks, while others are planning to take back older areas and areas that have been designated as off-limits.
White said that in the past few years, the number of park managers that have worked on these national conservation areas has grown by about one-third, and that the commission has not taken an official position on the national monuments in any of the proposed names.
“When the commission is deciding which parks to designate, it’s very hard to say who is a designated park manager and who isn’t,” White added.
“But the commission does not have any power over who gets to designate a national conservation area or a monument, so the commissioners’ decision is based on the merits of the name, not any official authority.”
“If it turns out the commissioners are wrong, it could be a major setback to conservation efforts.”
The national parks in California have a long and rich history, dating back to the early 20th century, when they were designated as national forests.
Today, about 300 million acres of the nation are covered with national forests or national parks.
The forests are considered critical habitat for thousands of species and habitats, including sage grouse, bald eagles, golden eagles and other birds.
More than 1,000 national parks, including Yosemite National Park, the Grand Canyon, Glacier National Park in Montana and Grand Teton National Park near Wyoming, are managed by the National Park System, the country’s top conservation agency.
The Great Basin is home to some of the largest concentrations of federally protected wildlife, including mountain lions, cougars, grizzlies, wolves and bobcats.
It is also home to hundreds of species of fish and birds, including bobcats, owls, sandhill cranes and black bears.
The state parks system, the U, is responsible for nearly 30 percent of the park system, with the National Wildlife Federation overseeing about 15 percent.
In addition, the Bureau of Land Management manages some national forests for recreation, mining and grazing, and oversees other land management programs.
More from NBC News Investigations: